Germany without Coercive Treatment in Psychiatry—A 15 Month Real World Experience
نویسنده
چکیده
Coercive treatment with antipsychotic drugs was commonly used in German psychiatric institutions until it became a topic of substantial medical, legal and ethical controversy. In 2011 and 2012, several landmark decisions by Germany’s Constitutional Court and Federal Supreme Court challenged this practice in all but life-threatening emergencies. In March 2013, the new legal provisions governing coercive treatment took effect allowing coercive medication under stricter criteria. While mainstream psychiatry in Germany resumed the use of coercive medication, although less frequently than before 2012, there are examples where clinicians put an even greater emphasis on consensual treatment and did not return to coercive treatment. Data from a case study in a local mental health service suggest that the use of coercive medication could be made obsolete.
منابع مشابه
International network of treatment alternatives for recovery – INTAR
The International Network of Treatment Alternative for Recovery (INTAR; http://www.intar.org) was founded in 2003 by a group of U.S. practitioners and advocates in mental health recovery including world renowned psychiatrists, people who have recovered from mental distress, psychologists, family members and other mental health professionals. The international organization grew out of the shared...
متن کاملCoercive treatment and stigma: is there a link?
Coercive treatment comprises compulsory admission of patients as well as coercive treatment measures. Both are sometimes inevitable elements of psychiatric care, with the aim to prevent danger from patients and other persons. The stigma of mental illness is still one of the most challenging treatment obstacles. It is not limited to patients and their families, but is also attached to treatment ...
متن کاملPatients' experiences of coercive treatment and coercive measures in psychiatric care
Results Forced medication was reported by 48% of the committed and by 3% of the voluntarily admitted patients. Ninetyfive % of the committed patients thought it was a negative experience when it happened and 89% thought it was wrong. At discharge or after three 3 weeks of care 73% of the committed patients thought it was wrong. Nineteen patients reported mechanical restraint, all of them commit...
متن کاملCoercive treatment in psychiatry: a comprehensive review. Reflections on the Dresden WPA Thematic Conference, June 2007
Address: 1President, World Psychiatry Association, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, NYU, 5th Avenue & 100th Street, Box 1091 New York, New York 10029-6574, USA, 2Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, D-01307 Dresden Germany and 3Parkkrankenhaus Leipzig-Südost, Klinik für Psychiatrie, Morawitzstrasse 2, D-04289 Leipzig, Germany * Correspondin...
متن کاملPsychiatry and the law: do the fields agree in their views on coercive treatment?
Coercion is an element of some treatments in psychiatry and it is contemplated in legislation, which often dictates parameters for involuntary admissions and use of restrictive treatments. A trend in the past years has been to widen the parameters required for commitment, thus extending coercive elements of psychiatric treatments to less immediate situations and into the community as in asserti...
متن کامل